Ray's Tap Reading Series - Manners, Please, 3/16/13
Friday, March 22, 2013 at 10:58PM Ray's is a great, if infrequent (maybe twice a year) Chicago show curated by Chris Bower. He selects a theme, then gives contributors source texts to which they write in response.
[Produce Complete Book of Etiquette]
Complete Book of Etiquette, by Amy Vanderbilt.
In preparation for this piece, I read this book cover to cover.
By which I mean I skimmed sections of it over the course of a series of poops.
Poops, I hasten to add, I should not be discussing publicly. Or privately. Or, in an ideal world, not be having at all.
If I were a person of breeding and good character, I would stop myself here to collect each of your addresses and send you a thoughtful and heartfelt handwritten note of apology for both the temerity of having expelled poops at all, and for the scandalously poor judgment I have here demonstrated by making public and now frequent mention of these poops.
See? There. I’ve done it again.
But I am a person of questionable breeding and low character. And as such, I not only make mention of having expelled repeated poops from this, my ass, which decorum demands that I not describe as caved in and chalky. And my family crest, our coat of arms, which appears at the top of every sheet of my stationary – is a slaughtered pig on a field of genital warts.
Which, if you knew heraldry, you would recognize as an enduring symbol of our nobility. But to the untrained eye just looks like a slaughtered pig on a field of genital warts.
So, I mean…
Ancestors. What’re you gonna do? Am I right?
But I was drawn to a section of Chapter 4: Other Ceremonial Occasions on Funerals, which contains the following line, in Some Do’s and Don’ts For Mourners:
When talking about death, stay clear of euphemisms like “he passed away,” or “she’s found her resting place.” Death is what it is. Pretending otherwise is unrealistic.
Now, it is unreasonable to expect realism of a book that devotes two full pages to what constitutes acceptable content while fox hunting, and has I-shit-you-not forty-five index listings under “Formal seated dinner with staff.”
But this line – this one line – I actually found beautiful, in its way.
The word “polite” comes to us from the Latin politus, which means “accomplished, refined, cultivated,” and derives from polire, “to smooth or polish.” As much of an abrasive dick-punch as I tend too often to be, there is a principle at the heart of politeness which I actually value a great deal, and which I find reflected in this line about staying clear of euphemisms.
I have no use, obviously, for the forty-five index listings under “Formal seated dinner with staff,” as it will never have any direct application to my experience thus far or any of my experience yet to come.
But the notion that life is a rough business, a rude and vexing trial, a lot of it – that requires of us the consensual adoption of a code of conduct, a shared idiom and a set of conventions that make life marginally more bearable. I believe in kindness – despite most of what my public conduct and insistent poop-talk would lead you to believe. But I believe a bit of polish – a mild burnishing – is worthy and needful. We are jagged, most of us, and thorny, and we need some grinding off of our sharpest quills.
I believe that life is a difficult and often quite excruciating business, and that if we can all agree to adopt certain sensible positions, and follow certain rational guidelines, then it becomes more possible for us to refrain from smashing each other with hammers while weeping bitter tears.
It is the difference, I think, between Civility and Propriety. Propriety is mostly ridiculous and unhelpful. Taken to its logical extreme, it culminates in place settings with nine forks and dainty minuets of protocol. Propriety is oppressive – those who know its particulars lord it over those who do not. It is ungenerous and persnickety; ostentatious and starchy.
But civility is quite wonderful, really. It is a means by which we reach some accord – we yield something of what we wish, and take care to take into account the wishes of someone else. On the face of it, this may not seem especially lofty or rousing. But when you think on it carefully, it becomes plain that it’s actually sort of astonishing. For a snarled mass of predatory and self-seeking primates to have hit upon a way to consistently avoid melee and ruin, a voluntary compact that results in an uneasy peace is downright amazing, really, given how swinish and hostile it is our natural inclination to be.
When talking about death, stay clear of euphemisms like “he passed away,” or “she’s found her resting place.” Death is what it is. Pretending otherwise is unrealistic.
In this line, we find much that’s worth striving for: plain speech; acceptance of reality, even, or perhaps especially, unpleasant reality; and an agreed-upon basis for proceeding, whatever difficulties may come.
I watched a movie with my kids not long ago. It had a scene where these knights in armor were fighting with swords. The way it was shot and the sound design really conveyed the sense of peril and pain. My son turned to me and said: “Man, people used to be a lot tougher than they are now.” No doubt about it.
I think the same is true about how we interact with each other. I think we were once a lot tougher than we are now. In the sense that we were much better versed in the art and science of disappointment. Setbacks were more expected, somehow. And as such did not dismantle us in the way they seem to now. We could know defeat, and our hopes would remain un-dashed.
Now, though. To avoid the pain and disquiet and self-disgust that now seems to attend every hindrance, we grow more grabby and piggish by the day. Which ensures only the hindrance and vexation of somebody else. Which renders them more retaliatory. Which exacerbates our own escalating sense that the world is populated by selfish douchey clowns whom we are right to snub and cut off and disregard. It would be a violation of our own interests, in fact, to be accommodating or agreeable.
Civility, though – it is not the permanent cessation of these hostilities. That asks too much. That assumes a degree of evolution and selflessness probably not possible. But civility permits a détente – a mutually assured pledge to stand down. Civility acknowledges that we are predatory and self-seeking primates, but permits a world where our hackles may always be up, our fangs may always be bared, but we agree not to strike.

